Financial Review: Pharming Group (NASDAQ:PHAR) and PDS Biotechnology (NASDAQ:PDSB)

Pharming Group (NASDAQ:PHAR) and PDS Biotechnology (NASDAQ:PDSB) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Pharming Group and PDS Biotechnology, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pharming Group	1	1	3	0	2.40
PDS Biotechnology	1	0	2	0	2.33

Pharming Group currently has a consensus price target of $38.33, suggesting a potential upside of 195.10%. PDS Biotechnology has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 733.33%. Given PDS Biotechnology’s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PDS Biotechnology is more favorable than Pharming Group.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Pharming Group and PDS Biotechnology”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pharming Group	$376.13 million	2.44	$2.85 million	$0.16	81.19
PDS Biotechnology	N/A	N/A	-$34.50 million	($0.67)	-1.61

Pharming Group has higher revenue and earnings than PDS Biotechnology. PDS Biotechnology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pharming Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Pharming Group has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PDS Biotechnology has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of Pharming Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of PDS Biotechnology shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pharming Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of PDS Biotechnology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Pharming Group and PDS Biotechnology’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pharming Group	3.30%	4.64%	2.55%
PDS Biotechnology	N/A	-346.02%	-102.36%

Summary

Pharming Group beats PDS Biotechnology on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Pharming Group

Pharming Group N.V., a biopharmaceutical company, develops and commercializes protein replacement therapies and precision medicines for the treatment of rare diseases in the United States, Europe, and internationally. The company offers RUCONEST, a recombinant C1 esterase inhibitor for the treatment of acute attacks in adult and adolescent patients with acute hereditary angioedema (HAE); and Joenja (leniolisib), an oral small molecule PI3K? inhibitor for the treatment of activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome. It also develops OTL-105, an investigational ex-vivo autologous hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for the treatment of HAE. The company has a development collaboration and license agreement with Novartis; and a strategic collaboration agreement with Orchard Therapeutics plc for research, development, manufacturing, and commercialization of OTL-105. Pharming Group N.V. was incorporated in 1988 and is headquartered in Leiden, the Netherlands.

About PDS Biotechnology

PDS Biotechnology Corporation, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, developing a pipeline of targeted cancer immunotherapies in the United States. The company's lead product candidate is PDS0101 (HPV16), which is in Phase II clinical trial provides a first line treatment for the recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, and human papillomavirus associated malignancies. It also develops various product candidates, which are in preclinical trials, including PDS0102, an investigational immunotherapy utilizing tumor-associated and immunologically active T cell receptor gamma alternate reading framed protein (TARP) for treating prostate and breast cancers; and PDS0103 for ovarian, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers. In addition, the company is developing PDS01ADC, a novel investigational Interleukin 12 fused antibody-drug conjugate that enhances the proliferation, potency, and longevity of T cells in the tumor microenvironment; and PDS0104, a novel investigational Tyrosinase-related Protein 2 targeted immunotherapy that stimulates a potent targeted T cell attack against melanoma. Further, the company provides PDS0202, a novel investigational influenza vaccine that generates broad and robust antibody and T cell responses that provide protection against continually evolving strains of seasonal flu and potentially emerging pandemic flu. It has a license and collaboration agreements with National Institutes of Health, Merck Eprova AG, The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and MSD International GmbH. The company was founded in 2005 and is based in Princeton, New Jersey.