Full House Resorts (FLL) vs. Its Peers Critical Analysis

Full House Resorts (NASDAQ: FLL) is one of 93 public companies in the “LEISURE SERVICES” industry, but how does it weigh in compared to its peers? We will compare Full House Resorts to similar companies based on the strength of its dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

How to Become a New Pot Stock Millionaire

This table compares Full House Resorts and its peers gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Net Income Price/Earnings Ratio
Full House Resorts $161.27 million -$5.02 million -13.87
Full House Resorts Competitors $2.94 billion $266.84 million 10.45

Full House Resorts’ peers have higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than its peers, indicating that it is currently more affordable than other companies in its industry.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

39.3% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.9% of shares of all “LEISURE SERVICES” companies are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of Full House Resorts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.5% of shares of all “LEISURE SERVICES” companies are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Full House Resorts and its peers’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full House Resorts -3.12% -9.22% -2.87%
Full House Resorts Competitors 1.27% 39.05% 3.45%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Full House Resorts and its peers, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full House Resorts 0 0 2 0 3.00
Full House Resorts Competitors 566 2468 4137 113 2.52

Full House Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $3.88, indicating a potential upside of 21.47%. As a group, “LEISURE SERVICES” companies have a potential upside of 6.57%. Given Full House Resorts’ stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than its peers.

Risk and Volatility

Full House Resorts has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts’ peers have a beta of 0.94, meaning that their average share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Full House Resorts peers beat Full House Resorts on 10 of the 13 factors compared.

Full House Resorts Company Profile

Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, operates, develops, manages, and/or invests in casinos and related hospitality and entertainment facilities. The Company’s casino/resort segments include the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel in Hancock County, Mississippi; the Rising Star Casino Resort in Rising Sun, Indiana, and the Northern Nevada segment, which consists of the Grand Lodge Casino in Incline Village, Nevada and Stockman’s Casino in Fallon, Nevada. The Company’s Development/Management segment includes costs associated with casino-related development and management projects. The Company has a leased property, Grand Lodge Casino. The Rising Star Casino Resort is located on the banks of the Ohio River in Rising Sun, Indiana. The Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel is situated on the far west end of the Mississippi Gulf Coast in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. The Grand Lodge Casino is located within Hyatt Regency in Incline Village, Nevada on the north shore of Lake Tahoe.

Receive News & Ratings for Full House Resorts Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Full House Resorts and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Latest News

Brokerages Set Big Yellow Group  PT at $895.00
Brokerages Set Big Yellow Group PT at $895.00
Ambarella  Receives $60.83 Average Price Target from Analysts
Ambarella Receives $60.83 Average Price Target from Analysts
Analysts Set State Bank Financial  PT at $34.00
Analysts Set State Bank Financial PT at $34.00
Head-To-Head Comparison: Trinity Biotech  versus Its Rivals
Head-To-Head Comparison: Trinity Biotech versus Its Rivals
Head to Head Analysis: McCormick & Company, Incorporated  vs. Medifast
Head to Head Analysis: McCormick & Company, Incorporated vs. Medifast
Orix  & PHH  Head-To-Head Survey
Orix & PHH Head-To-Head Survey


© 2006-2018 Ticker Report. Google+.